Check ping to potential servers for 2019


#1

I have cancelled the US server because it is too expensive and never gets played on. The EU server is mostly stable but not perfect so I’m looking at EU again too. It is reliable enough I don’t really expect to switch, but I may as well double check while I’m looking at US servers. Not planning to look at any new hosts, but network performance changes over time so looking at them again.

US:

  1. Current server IP: 67.202.80.146
  2. Most reliable alternate host we have used (Amazon): 54.146.183.207
  3. 74.201.240.123
  4. 185.7.224.190
  5. 35.230.166.214

EU:

  1. Current server IP: 130.193.86.234
  2. 206.142.242.98
  3. 82.163.78.28
  4. 18.130.154.104
  5. 35.246.21.38

Also going to check out Microsoft Azure, but for some reason it sounds like it impossible to allow pinging them. So I’ll try to test myself as much as possible and maybe put up a server to join in game to check if it looks decent.

To ping on Windows open up the command prompt and type: ping


#2

Here are my pings:

US:

  1. 99 ms avg.
  2. 109 ms avg.
  3. 102 ms avg.
  4. 97 ms avg.
  5. 101 ms avg.

EU:

  1. 29 ms avg.
  2. 35 ms avg.
  3. 30 ms avg.
  4. 30 ms avg.
  5. 28 ms avg.

From Denmark.


#3

Pings from Netherlands:

US:

  1. 112 ms avg.
  2. 112 ms avg.
  3. 90 ms avg.
  4. 112 ms avg.
  5. 107 ms avg.

EU:

  1. 21 ms avg.
  2. 29 ms avg.
  3. 21 ms avg.
  4. 28 ms avg.
  5. 16 ms avg.

#4

Seattle, WA

US:

  1. 88 ms
  2. 82 ms
  3. 89 ms
  4. 86 ms
  5. 78 ms

EU:

  1. 153 ms
  2. 158 ms
  3. 157 ms
  4. 160 ms
  5. 149 ms

#5

Greece

Transmitting 20 packets from linux, writing down minimum/average/maximum:

US:

  1. 160.645/ 162.996/ 166.579 ms
  2. 152.782/ 155.237/ 163.590 ms
  3. 168.518/ 171.116/ 175.744 ms
  4. 149.489/ 153.051/ 166.008 ms
  5. 163.165/ 167.206/ 178.058 ms

EU:

  1. 86.834/ 92.858/ 125.011 ms
  2. 92.979/ 99.848/ 163.500 ms
  3. 85.366/ 88.161/ 93.592 ms
  4. 82.086/ 85.088/ 95.985 ms
  5. 85.171/ 87.949/ 97.347 ms

P.S: I am pretty sure any ping spikes shown were not caused by my internet connection.


#6
67.202.80.146  : xmt/rcv/%loss = 100/100/0%, min/avg/max = 109/111/119
54.146.183.207 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 100/100/0%, min/avg/max = 108/110/118
74.201.240.123 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 100/100/0%, min/avg/max = 89.7/91.4/99.8
185.7.224.190  : xmt/rcv/%loss = 100/100/0%, min/avg/max = 110/112/121
35.230.166.214 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 100/100/0%, min/avg/max = 89.1/90.8/107
130.193.86.234 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 100/100/0%, min/avg/max = 14.8/16.5/27.8
206.142.242.98 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 100/100/0%, min/avg/max = 22.8/24.8/34.4
82.163.78.28   : xmt/rcv/%loss = 100/98/2%, min/avg/max = 18.8/20.4/28.6
18.130.154.104 : xmt/rcv/%loss = 100/100/0%, min/avg/max = 15.1/17.2/32.1
35.246.21.38   : xmt/rcv/%loss = 100/100/0%, min/avg/max = 19.1/21.3/36.9

#7

Italy

US:

  1. 114 avg.
  2. 116 avg.
  3. 109 avg.
  4. 100 avg.
  5. 107 avg.

EU:

  1. 38 avg.
  2. 44 avg.
  3. 38 avg.
  4. 36 avg.
  5. 35 avg

#8

US:

1. 198 avg
2. 214 avg
3. 195 avg
4. 203 avg
5. 188 avg

EU:

1. 274 avg
2. 274 avg
3. 273 avg
4. 275 avg
5. 256 avg

#9

San Jose, CR

US

  1. 83 ms avg.
  2. 118 ms avg.
  3. 99 ms avg.
  4. 85 ms avg.
  5. 84 ms avg.

EU

  1. 159 ms avg.
  2. 162 ms avg.
  3. 173 ms avg.
  4. 155 ms avg.
  5. 169 ms avg.

#10

Sweden

US:

  1. 96 ms avg.
  2. 103 ms avg.
  3. 102 ms avg.
  4. 100 ms avg.
  5. 106 ms avg.

EU:

  1. 36 ms avg.
  2. 37 ms avg.
  3. 28 ms avg. Timed out first try though.
  4. 29 ms avg.
  5. 34 ms avg.